Photo Credit: cigdem via shutterstock

Quota or no quota

Gender imbalance is not a fatality, but could require a temporary balancing measure

What do politics and science have in common? They are no alien to controversy. Take for example, the use of quota for gender balancing. Politics has previously relied such quotas to improve the way political representation mirrors that of society it governs. Yet, suggestions that gender quota should be introduced in science to redress the imbalances between the number of women and men at the highest levels of academia, have led to controversy. Some believe the move lessens the merit of women who cross the highest echelons of the career ladder. Their only selection criterion is excellence.

Experience in other sectors proves otherwise. Looking into the field of politics or corporate boards helps. In both cases, gender quota have been introduced in the past. Results have received mixed reviews. But overall, once the habit of bringing more women onboard has been established, the need for quota is less pressing. And women find their place more naturally in these sectors.


In academia, quota are not common practice. In 2015, EMBO published the results of a year-long study on quota. It gives a synthesis of literature related to binding and voluntary quotas as well as the outcome of consultation with people who have experienced them. The report’s verdict is not clear cut. Instead of making recommendation on the use quota, it merely outlines the positive and negative aspects of the implementation of different types of quotas. But it does not reach a definite conclusion on their usefulness.

Although quota are designed to bypass career constraints faced by women, they can help bring women further along the career ladder; even though that ladder is typically designed for men. There is always the risk that when measures of that nature are in place, women could be undermined. But this temporary discomfort, may be the necessary price to pay to kick-start future good habits. Now, it would be great to know what EuroScientist readers think of it. Let us know.

Featured image credit: cigdem via Shutterstock

Go back to the Special Issue: Gender balance

EuroScientist is looking for contributors!

If you would like to write guest posts in EuroScientist magazine, send us your suggestions of articles at office@euroscientist.com.


Sabine Louët

Sabine Louët

Former editor at EuroScientist
Sabine has a passion for all things related to European research. A physicist by training, she has been covering stories in life science, the physical sciences, technology, policy and innovation for the past 20 years. She was previously the news editor at Nature Biotechnology. She was also involved in the creation of AlphaGalileo. She is the Founder of SciencePOD translating complex science and tech concepts into high-quality articles written in simple language.
Sabine Louët

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “Quota or no quota”

  1. Science is not “other sectors”! Excellent science
    is excellent science, no matter who the author is, a man or a woman. Should we
    introduce also quotas for publishing scientific papers? Milder review criteria
    for women authors? Should we reject scientific papers if at least 30 % of the
    authors are not women? The idea is insulting for all women pursuing a
    scientific career.